Which One is Better for Developing dApps, BSC or Solana?

Posted by

To take advantage of the advantages of decentralisation, businesses are experimenting with the exciting realm of cryptocurrencies and dApp development. The underlying technologies that make up decentralised platforms affect the functionality, security, and general level of consumer satisfaction of decentralised applications and goods. Blockchain is the fundamental technology that aims to provide decentralisation, security, and scalability into established systems when discussing cryptocurrencies and dApps.

Recently, a number of layer 1 (sometimes referred to as L1) blockchain networks have emerged, promising unbreakable security, a strong and adaptable design, and high transaction throughput. For a considerable amount of time, Ethereum has dominated the market as the blockchain network most suited for the creation of decentralised applications. There are advantages and disadvantages to the several current solutions, all of which are vying for Ethereum’s attention. In one of our most recent posts, we had discussed some of the fundamental distinctions between Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain (also known as BSC). We will contrast Solana and BSC in this blog and determine which is better suited for dApp development.

How does the Binance Smart Chain provide a suitable environment for the creation of DApps?

Binance announced Binance Smart Chain in September 2020, as the contest among blockchain networks for high transaction throughput was about to start. High scalability, cheap transaction costs, quick block times, quick transactions, and support for smart contracts are all features of the fully evolved blockchain network.

Principal Elements of Binance Smart Chain

  • Verifiers

There can be no more than 21 validators. Anyone who has more BNB at risk is entitled to participate in the transaction as an active validator.

  • Linking across chains

Users can convert their USDT, ETH, or BUSD to BSC by using a bridge that BSC builds using the Binance Bridge. This guarantees seamless compatibility, which makes BSC dApp development the best option for many enterprises.

  • Mechanism for Consensus

By reducing the number of validators and introducing DPoS and PoA consensus techniques, the blockchain was able to achieve very reduced transactional costs and noticeably high transactions per second (TPS).

How does Solana intend to provide an appropriate environment for the creation of decentralised applications?

Solana is a tier 1 blockchain network that was introduced in 2017 and is currently popular owing to its high scalability, surprisingly fast transactional speed, unbreakable security, and reliability.

Characteristics of Solana

  • Mechanism for Consensus:

The Proof of History (PoH) consensus mechanism used by the blockchain platform verifies the gap in time between two occurrences using a series of computer operations. This protocol ensures that transactions are properly recorded. Additionally, the PoS (Proof of Stake) mechanism is implemented by the network using Tower BFT, ensuring robust security and stability.

  • Architecture without States:

Solana is a better network for dApp development company since applications are not have to remember the state of the blockchain, which results in less memory usage and faster transactions.

  • Verifiers:

Decentralization is preserved while flawless performance is guaranteed via the network. To reach consensus on a certain transaction, a significant number of validators are needed. Additionally, the fact that over 75% of the $SOL tokens are staked at the moment this blog is being published demonstrates the currency’s tremendous resilience to attacks.

Create a decentralised application of your own

The Complete Comparison between BSC and Solana

The two blockchain networks have now been described in general terms. Now, let’s discuss some crucial criteria for a side-by-side comparison of the development of decentralised applications on both blockchains.

  • Block Time and Scalability

High scalability is a feature of both blockchain networks, however there is a significant difference between them in terms of block time and transaction throughput. According to BSC Scan, the network’s typical block time is about three seconds. On the basis of daily transfer data, it is also noted that BSC handled 62.4 transactions per second with a network utilisation rate of 38.91%. As a result, it can handle 160 transactions per second while utilising the entire network. On the other hand, Solana recently allowed a block period of 0.610 seconds and 700 TPS. As stated by the project, the Solana network’s capacity can be increased up to 65,000 TPS.

Transaction Charges

Low transaction fees are a feature of both blockchain networks. In the case of Binance Smart Chain, the average transaction cost is 0.0009348 BNB, whereas that of Solana is 0.000005 SOL.

  • Centralization, Security, and Validators

One can compare the number of validators need to take part in the consensus mechanism of the two competing blockchain networks to analyse the levels of security and decentralisation. In contrast to Solana, which has an unspecified number of validators, Binance Smart Chain needs the involvement of 21 validators. Solana is a clear winner in terms of the degree of decentralisation.

On the other side, PoS protocols set and control the security levels of both blockchain networks. It shows that both perform similarly on a scale of security.


One might infer from the analysis made above that both blockchain networks have the potential to dethrone one another in the case of one or more metrics. Depending on their project preferences, businesses should choose BSC dApp development or Solana dApp development.